Will Texas elect a Libertarian as POTUS?

Bob Barr Files Suit in Texas to Remove McCain, Obama from Ballot

Suit alleges that McCain, Obama knowingly missed filing deadlines

Atlanta, GA –  Bob Barr, the Libertarian Party’s nominee for president, has filed a lawsuit in Texas demanding Senators John McCain and Barack Obama be removed from the ballot after they missed the official filing deadline.

“The seriousness of this issue is self-evident,” the lawsuit states. “The hubris of the major parties has risen to such a level that they do not believe that the election laws of the State of Texas apply to them.”

Texas election code §192.031 requires that the “written certification” of the “party’s nominees” be delivered “before 5 p.m. of the 70th day before election day.”  Because neither candidate had been nominated by the official filing deadline, the Barr campaign argues it was impossible for the candidates to file under state law.

“Supreme Court justices should recognize that their responsibility is to apply the law as passed by the Legislature, and the law is clear that the candidates cannot be certified on the ballot if their filings are late,” says Drew Shirley, a local attorney for the Barr campaign, who is also a Libertarian candidate for the Texas Supreme Court.

A 2006 Texas Supreme Court decision ruled that state laws “does not allow political parties or candidates to ignore statutory deadlines.”

Orrin Grover, attorney for Bob Barr and Wayne Root, said that he believes that the Texas Secretary of State is bound by Texas law to remove the Republican and Democratic nominees from the November ballot. “Either we have rules and deadlines, or we do not,” Grover said.

The Chairman of the Texas Libertarian Party, Pat Dixon stated, “Libertarian principles require personal responsibility for your acts and failures. Obama and McCain failed to meet the deadlines. They must follow the law like everyone else.”

The petition also alleges that the Democratic Party’s late presidential filing falsely claimed under oath that Senator Obama had been nominated hours before the nomination actually occurred.

“The facts of the case are not in dispute,” says Russell Verney, manager of the Barr campaign.  “Republicans and Democrats missed the deadline, but were still allowed on the ballot.  Third parties are not allowed on the ballot for missing deadlines, as was the case for our campaign in West Virginia, yet the Texas secretary of state’s office believes Republicans and Democrats to be above the law.”

Barr will be holding a press conference this Thursday at the Texas Supreme Court at 11:00 a.m.

Libertarian Party presidential candidate Bob Barr represented the 7th District of Georgia in the U. S. House of Representatives from 1995 to 2003.


3 Responses to Will Texas elect a Libertarian as POTUS?

  1. reidgreenmun says:

    It will be pretty funny id Obama voters and McCain voters have to writin the name of their candidates!

    I suppose this simply goes to prove the point that the rules governing elections serve mostly to prevent third party candidates from getting on the ballot?

  2. richroberts says:

    I’ve been amused while following this story. Sometimes it is fun to bow the the absurd.

    I think it would be absurd to deny Texans their right to vote for whichever candidate they wish to vote for.
    Just like I think it is absurd that many “third-party” candidates are not listed in each state and people are robbed of their right to cast a vote for them.

    As this has been getting more and more attention, my hope has been that people realize how restrictive and insane the ballot access laws are in most state and will move to make them less restrictive.

    However, I know in the end the rules will be adjusted to make things easier on Republican and Democrats and do nothing to make it easier on the little guys who actually have to struggle with this each election.

  3. richroberts says:

    No suprise.
    McBama will be on the ballot.
    The judges of the Texas Supreme Court didn’t offer an explanation for their ruling.
    Why Not? Well, probably because they knew they were not complying with the Laws of Texas as they are sworn to do.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: