wordpress.com dopuszczalny czas składowania minął
w 1975 roku kalendarzowym, Analizując z
pozostałych wpisów na skrzynce, miny pochodziły z potyczki koreańskiej.

Frodo sam nie
spytał, jaki Wagnerowi sprzedał ów złom. Podejrzewał Rosjan, oni zwykle nie
znali angielskiego, natomiast miny nabrali bodaj ramach
ofensywy pod spodem Pusan. W
ekstremalnej momentu zdołał pows.

just to add:

One columnist reminds that this will cost jobs especially among blacks who already have a higher unemployment rate.

You explain well that the extra cost, money, must come from somewhere, less employees, higher cost of goods and services (for the consumer), all leaving less money to spend elsewhere on something else.

I surmise that at least 80% of voters don’t understand this fallacy.

IF a higher minimum wage is good, why not raise it to $20/hour?

I see it as form of socialism, a redistribution of wealth.

If the Chinese work for $5/day, how can they buy US made at $9/hour? How will the higher minimum wage help balance the trade deficit?

A $600 billion trade deficit is equal to 12 million jobs paying $50K/year, each.

Seriously, I once thought that punishing the Republicans with a few losses might be a viable strategy too. But when you look at it from the Republicans point of view, it is counterproductive.

We get at most 5% of the vote on a good year. So, if the GOP wants to court us, what can they offer that doesn’t cost them more votes on the other end?

If they come our way on a less aggressive foreign policy, how many votes do they lose to Democrats. Remember, the Neo-Cons were Democrats before, and if the GOP writes off the “strong defense” voting block to get us, they lose more than they gain.

Likewise, if they come our way on social issues, they lose more voters to the Constitution Party than they gain from us.

Moving further toward Laissez Faire Capitalism won’t gain them as many votes as pandering toward the middle.

In short, we just aren’t in a position, with the electorate as it exists, to bully them our way. Anything they do to move our way costs them more votes than we have to give them. For them, it is about winning.

There is nothing for us to gain by making them enemies, but as allies, we can persuade, especially since we are demonstrably right on the issues.

Down here in Tidewater, by cooperating with the Tea Party component of the GOP, we are bringing more and more Republicans to see the Libertarian view, and when enough of the GOP thinks libertarian, we will be in a position to either bend the GOP our way or take the Tea Party away from the GOP.

But if we sabotage the election, we are the enemy, and their ears and hearts will be closed to what we have to offer.

“The present generation suffers every hardship and cost of war, although anticipation pretends that it is covered by future generations. And this delusion is used to involve nations in wars, which they would never commence, if they knew that all the expense would fall upon themselves. It is twice suffered; by the living, who supply all the expenses of war; by the unborn, who supply an equivalent sum, to take up certificates of the expenses paid by the living.”–John Taylor of Caroline

It is packed with lighting gear, stands, cameras, etc.

I could have 2 vehicles, but that would just increase my costs.

Or, I could live near work, which I do (3 miles or so), and use less fuel than a Prius who commutes 30 miles.

Appearances are not always what they seem to be.

However, the staffer running the a/c is inexcusable.

And that holds true for all whether conservative or liberal.